Key Specifications

SpecificationFalcon 180BLlama 2 70B
Vendorothermeta
Versionfalcon-180b2-70b
Release Date2023-09-062023-07-18
Context Window2048 tokens4096 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseTII Falcon LLM LicenseLlama 2 Community License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkFalcon 180BLlama 2 70BWinner
ARC91.680.3Falcon 180B
BBH76.462.5Falcon 180B
GPQA43.227.2Falcon 180B
GSM8K77.551.8Falcon 180B
HUMANEVAL68.950.6Falcon 180B
IFEVAL70.557.1Falcon 180B
MATH44.822.4Falcon 180B
MMLU76.753Falcon 180B
MUSR59.136.1Falcon 180B
WINOGRANDE8073.4Falcon 180B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Falcon 180BLlama 2 70B
Input$1$0.9
Output$1$0.9
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Falcon 180B tegen Llama 2 70B

Modeloverzicht

Falcon 180B and Llama 2 70B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Belangrijkste specificaties

LeverancierReleasedatumContextvensterLicentie
Other / Meta2023-09-06 / 2023-07-182K / 4KTII Falcon LLM License / Llama 2 Community License

Benchmarkprestaties

BenchmarkFalcon 180BLlama 2 70BWinnaar
ARC91.680.3A
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)76.462.5A
GPQA43.227.2A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)77.551.8A
HumanEval68.950.6A
IFEval70.557.1A
MATH44.822.4A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)76.753.0A
MUSR59.136.1A
WinoGrande80.073.4A

Prijsvergelijking

InvoerUitvoerCache-lezenCache-schrijven
— / —— / —— / —— / —

per miljoen tokens — A / B

Sterktes & Zwaktes

Falcon 180B

  • ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。
  • ⚠️ 上下文窗口 2K 偏小。

Llama 2 70B

  • ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
  • ⚠️ MMLU 仅 53.0,知识推理偏弱。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。
  • ⚠️ 上下文窗口 4K 偏小。

Redactionele inzage

Falcon 180B and Llama 2 70B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Referenties

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.