Key Specifications

SpecificationGPT-4oo1 Preview
Vendoropenaiopenai
Version4oo1-preview
Release Date2024-05-132024-09-12
Context Window128000 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audiotext
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGPT-4oo1 PreviewWinner
ARC96o1 Preview
BBH83.184.5o1 Preview
GPQA57.7o1 Preview
GSM8K95.892.5GPT-4o
HUMANEVAL90.290.1GPT-4o
IFEVAL84.4o1 Preview
MATH76.671.5GPT-4o
MMLU88.785.3GPT-4o
MUSR64.1o1 Preview
WINOGRANDE85.2o1 Preview

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)GPT-4oo1 Preview
Input$2.5$15
Output$10$60
Cache Read$1.25$0
Cache Write$2.5$0

GPT-4o contro o1 Preview

Panoramica del modello

GPT-4o and o1 Preview are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Specifiche chiave

FornitoreData di rilascioFinestra di contestoLicenza
Openai / Openai2024-05-13 / 2024-09-12128K / 128KProprietary / Proprietary

Prestazioni benchmark

BenchmarkGPT-4oo1 PreviewVincitore
ARC96.0B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)83.184.5B
GPQA57.7B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)95.892.5A
HumanEval90.290.1Tie
IFEval84.4B
MATH76.671.5A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.785.3A
MUSR64.1B
WinoGrande85.2B

Confronto prezzi

InputOutputLettura cacheScrittura cache
— / —— / —— / —— / —

per milione di token — A / B

Punti di forza & Punti deboli

GPT-4o

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

o1 Preview

  • ✅ MMLU score 85.3, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.1, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 92.5, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Opinione dell’editore

GPT-4o and o1 Preview each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Riferimenti

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.